Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law

Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law : Videos

LexisNexis Legal News for July 30, 2010 LexisNexis Legal News for July 30, 2010 four provisions of Arizona's new, controversial immigration law from going into effect and the California Supreme Court rules on contingency ... Rated: -1     Duration: 489 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:29:19 PDT	Supreme Court: The Term in Review (2008-2009) Part 2 of 2 Supreme Court: The Term in Review (2008-2009) Part 2 of 2 Four of the nation's top constitutional scholars review and discuss those decisions from the Supreme Court's October 2008 Term that are ... Rated: 3.4     Duration: 3753 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 13 May 2010 08:22:13 PDT	Massachusetts v. EPA: Implications of the Supreme Court Verdict (Part 1 of 2) Massachusetts v. EPA: Implications of the Supreme Court Verdict (Part 1 of 2) Massachusetts v. EPA: Implications of the Supreme Court Verdict (Part 1 of 2) - Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming - 2007 ... Rated: -1     Duration: 6533 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:35:42 PDT	KingCast & Jim Dinsmore testify on Robert Taylors Law Mass S 8013 (Tarr) KingCast & Jim Dinsmore testify on Robert Taylors Law Mass S 8013 (Tarr) This is the first hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding a bill that I initiated in honor of Robert Taylor, a man who died a ... Rated: -1     Duration: 140 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:04:18 PDT
my political platform my political platform US family, and abide by the same laws as everyone else * endorse "Read the Bill Act" (72 hour rule), "Enumerated Powers Act" ... Rated: 4.3333335     Duration: 610 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:14:26 PDT	Examining Abuses of Medicaid Eligibility Rules Examining Abuses of Medicaid Eligibility Rules Examining Abuses of Medicaid Eligibility Rules - House Oversight - 2011-09-21 - House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Subcommittee ... Rated: -1     Duration: 5391 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:42:03 PDT	Health Care Reform Debate Health Care Reform Debate University of Arkansas hosts a Health Care Reform Debate sponsored by the Federalist Society University of Arkansas School of Law. With Mr. Ilya ... Rated: 5     Duration: 3694 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:16:57 PDT	Schoolhouse Rock- How a Bill Becomes a Law Schoolhouse Rock- How a Bill Becomes a Law Schoolhouse Rock- How a Bill becomes a law. Enjoy. And plz watch my other vids. Rated: 4.877974     Duration: 180 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:49:19 PDT
16. Evolution of Tobacco Law 16. Evolution of Tobacco Law Environmental Politics and Law (EVST 255) This lecture continues the previous class's discussion of tobacco law. In this class, Professor ... Rated: -1     Duration: 2840 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:40:52 PST	Healthy Planet, Health People: Global Warming and Public Health Healthy Planet, Health People: Global Warming and Public Health Healthy Planet, Health People: Global Warming and Public Health - Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming - 2008-04-09 - On ... Rated: 5     Duration: 6637 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:02:18 PDT	Healthy Body = Functional Body. Hollywood Look Side Effect: Healthy Function Healthy Body = Functional Body. Hollywood Look Side Effect: Healthy Function My Grandparents chose to love each other when they met as teenagers, and then, they chose to love each other every part of every day, through the ... Rated: 1.8654971     Duration: 167 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:46:52 PDT	Law Videos - Criminal Law 1 Law Videos - Criminal Law 1 How is a criminal case born? Rated: 4.8333335     Duration: 53 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:50:08 PST
Law Videos - Criminal Law 2 Law Videos - Criminal Law 2 What is a Probable Cause? Rated: 5     Duration: 46 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:51:42 PST	Boris Karloff: The Criminal Code Boris Karloff: The Criminal Code descent, seeking their fortune in America, must have fallen on the wrong side of the law once in a while too! Boris Karloff (1887-1969) was the ... Rated: 5     Duration: 410 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:34:20 PST	House Session 2011-06-23 (15:11:49-16:12:18) House Session 2011-06-23 (15:11:49-16:12:18) THAT WE'RE DOING THINGS THAT INTERFERING WITH ONGOING COURT TESTS, THERE HAVE BEEN A SERIES OF VOTES ABOUT THE HEALTH CARE LAW AND ARE MORE ... Rated: -1     Duration: 3630 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:37:16 PDT	House Session 2011-05-24 (18:14:06-19:16:18) House Session 2011-05-24 (18:14:06-19:16:18) IN THE HEALTH CARE LAW AND LIMIT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S UNPRECEDENTED POWER. SECTION 5508 OF THE HEALTH CARE LAW, AUTHORIZES THE HEALTH AND ... Rated: 5     Duration: 3733 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:47:41 PDT
House Session 2011-06-23 (15:11:49-16:12:18) House Session 2011-06-23 (15:11:49-16:12:18) THAT WE'RE DOING THINGS THAT INTERFERING WITH ONGOING COURT TESTS, THERE HAVE BEEN A SERIES OF VOTES ABOUT THE HEALTH CARE LAW AND ARE MORE ... Rated: -1     Duration: 3630 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:37:16 PDT	House Session 2011-05-24 (18:14:06-19:16:18) House Session 2011-05-24 (18:14:06-19:16:18) IN THE HEALTH CARE LAW AND LIMIT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S UNPRECEDENTED POWER. SECTION 5508 OF THE HEALTH CARE LAW, AUTHORIZES THE HEALTH AND ... Rated: 5     Duration: 3733 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:47:41 PDT	The Story of Susette Kelo The Story of Susette Kelo development. It'll be 3 or 4 months at least before the Supreme Court makes its decision. If it rules against the city and in the protesters ... Rated: 5     Duration: 660 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:32:26 PST	Senate Session 2011-06-09 (14:29:58-15:30:25) Senate Session 2011-06-09 (14:29:58-15:30:25) THEY ARE NOW SPENDING TO IMPLEMENT THE HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL THAT IS IN THE COURTS. TODAY -- OR ACTUALLY IT WAS YESTERDAY THE COURT IN ATLANTA ... Rated: 1     Duration: 3628 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:29:41 PDT
House Session 2011-04-14 (15:15:09-16:55:20) House Session 2011-04-14 (15:15:09-16:55:20) CAN SELL THEIR EMPLOYEE'S HEALTH CARE COVERAGE BECAUSE THEY WOULD LOSE THE TAX CREDITS TO PAY FOR IT. THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS LAW, AND ... Rated: -1     Duration: 6012 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:27:10 PDT	3/16/10: White House Press Briefing 3/16/10: White House Press Briefing plates of legislators, regardless of the outcome of health care. We've mentioned in here over the past several days the Supreme Court case ... Rated: 3.5     Duration: 3123 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:50:38 PDT	Senate Session 2011-05-17 (11:11:38-12:14:32) Senate Session 2011-05-17 (11:11:38-12:14:32) TO PRACTICE IN SEVEN COURTS INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, AND THE US COURT OF APPEALS ... Rated: -1     Duration: 3775 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:29 PDT	1/21/10: White House Press Briefing 1/21/10: White House Press Briefing a follow-up. The President mentioned the Volcker rule -- didn't say the Goolsbee rule or the Summers rule or anybody else's rule. Mr ... Rated: 3.6     Duration: 3525 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:32:55 PST
The Colbert Report, Season 7, Episode 07035: Bench Press - Anthony ... The Colbert Report, Season 7, Episode 07035: Bench Press - Anthony ... Duration: 325000 seconds Hosted by: Comedy Central	Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duration: 325000 seconds Hosted by: Comedy CentralHosted by: blip.tv	Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duration: 325000 seconds Hosted by: Comedy CentralHosted by: blip.tvHosted by: blip.tv	2011-2012 Supreme Court Term Preview 2011-2012 Supreme Court Term Preview Duration: 5220000 seconds Hosted by: C-SPAN
The Obama Administration: Judge Rules Against Obama Health Care Law The Obama Administration: Judge Rules Against Obama Health Care Law Duration: 731000 seconds Hosted by: Hulu	application/x-shockwave-flash application/x-shockwave-flash Duration: 731000 seconds Hosted by: HuluHosted by: myVidster	Where Will Supreme Court Stand on Health-Care? Where Will Supreme Court Stand on Health-Care? Duration: 182000 seconds Hosted by: Fox Business	Can Kagan Rule on Health Care Law? Can Kagan Rule on Health Care Law? Duration: 117000 seconds Hosted by: Frequency
Supreme Courts Role in Health Care Clash Supreme Courts Role in Health Care Clash Duration: 117000 seconds Hosted by: FrequencyHosted by: Fox News	26 States Challenge Health-Care Law 26 States Challenge Health-Care Law Duration: 117000 seconds Hosted by: FrequencyHosted by: Fox NewsHosted by: FOXBUSINESS	Supreme Court Overturns Campaign Spending Limits on Corporations ... Supreme Court Overturns Campaign Spending Limits on Corporations ... Duration: 117000 seconds Hosted by: FrequencyHosted by: Fox NewsHosted by: FOXBUSINESSHosted by: ABC News	Sam Agrees with High Court Decision Sam Agrees with High Court Decision Duration: 122000 seconds Hosted by: ABC News
The Colbert Report, Season 7, Episode 07035: Bench Press - Anthony ... The Colbert Report, Season 7, Episode 07035: Bench Press - Anthony ... Duration: 325000 seconds Hosted by: Comedy Central	Top court strikes down amnesty law - PAKISTAN - FRANCE 24 Top court strikes down amnesty law - PAKISTAN - FRANCE 24 Duration: 325000 seconds Hosted by: Comedy Central	Joe Miller: Rule of Law Not Being Followed Joe Miller: Rule of Law Not Being Followed Duration: 2389000 seconds Hosted by: ABC News	Virginia Judge Rules Health Care Mandate Unconstitutional Virginia Judge Rules Health Care Mandate Unconstitutional Duration: 54000 seconds Hosted by: Carbonated.tv
CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate Duration: 54000 seconds Hosted by: Carbonated.tv	CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate Duration: 54000 seconds Hosted by: Carbonated.tv	CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate Duration: 54000 seconds Hosted by: Carbonated.tv	CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate Duration: 54000 seconds Hosted by: Carbonated.tv
Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duration: 54000 seconds Hosted by: Carbonated.tvHosted by: blip.tv	scotus rules twice for big pharma scotus rules twice for big pharma Duration: 200000 seconds Hosted by: Dailymotion	Kagan: Abortion Laws Must Protect Womens Health Kagan: Abortion Laws Must Protect Womens Health Duration: 200000 seconds Hosted by: DailymotionHosted by: YouTube	CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate Duration: 200000 seconds Hosted by: DailymotionHosted by: YouTube
California Supreme Court--Inverse Condemnation California Supreme Court--Inverse Condemnation Duration: 398000 seconds Hosted by: YouTube	CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate CitizenLink.com - a Focus on the Family Affiliate Duration: 398000 seconds Hosted by: YouTube	Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duthel Intelligence Report. 2011 Libyan civil war Duration: 398000 seconds Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: blip.tv

Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law : Photo Gallery

SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW - WSJ. SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW - WSJ. Supreme Court Agrees to Rule	SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW - WSJ. SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW - WSJ. Supreme Court Agrees to Rule	SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW - WSJ. SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW - WSJ. Supreme Court Agrees to Rule	Twitter Trackbacks for SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW ... Twitter Trackbacks for SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW ... hasanhilmy Hasan A. Hilmy News: Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law
Supreme Court weighs legality of GPS tracking Supreme Court weighs legality of GPS tracking Court Rules Health Law Is	Supreme Court Will Rule This Year on Health Reform Law Supreme Court Will Rule This Year on Health Reform Law Supreme Court agrees to hear Obama healthcare law	Justice Department Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Health Care Bill ... Justice Department Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Health Care Bill ... If the court agrees,	Will the Supreme Court Rule on the Health Care Law? - AARP Bulletin Will the Supreme Court Rule on the Health Care Law? - AARP Bulletin The Supreme Court may or may
Twitter Trackbacks for SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW ... Twitter Trackbacks for SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW ... ryan1bowen Ryan Bowen Supreme Court set to rule on the health-care overhaul	JP-SCOTUS-thumbStandard.jpg JP-SCOTUS-thumbStandard.jpg Health Law Debate Puts Focus	SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW – Wall Street Journal ... SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW – Wall Street Journal ... Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law – Wall Street Journal | News	OB-QO183_irel11_D_ ... OB-QO183_irel11_D_ ... Supreme Court agrees to rule
SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW – Wall Street Journal ... SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW – Wall Street Journal ... Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law – Wall Street Journal | News	76 76 Supreme Court agrees to rule	76 76 Supreme Court agrees to rule	Utopic - search "" Utopic - search "" Health Law Debate Puts Focus
... Department Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Health Care Bill | News | BET ... Department Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Health Care Bill | News | BET	Health care lawsuit: Supreme Court won’t fast track Virginia AG Ken ... Health care lawsuit: Supreme Court won’t fast track Virginia AG Ken ...	Renée Binder, M.D.: “If the Supreme Court finds in favor of our ... Renée Binder, M.D.: “If the Supreme Court finds in favor of our ...	Pragmatism : Reference (The Full Wiki) Pragmatism : Reference (The Full Wiki)
Pragmatism : Reference (The Full Wiki) Pragmatism : Reference (The Full Wiki)	GlaxoSmithKline: Where Billions in Fines Dont Dent the Bottom Line (g1a2d0050c1) GlaxoSmithKline: Where Billions in Fines Dont Dent the Bottom Line (g1a2d0050c1) GlaxoSmithKline: Where Billions in Fines Dont Dent the Bottom Line (g1a2d0050c1)	Ferdinand Marcos : The Great Ilocano Ferdinand Marcos : The Great Ilocano Ferdinand Marcos : The Great Ilocano	A Wonder Man Called Baba Ramdev A Wonder Man Called Baba Ramdev A Wonder Man Called Baba Ramdev
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code	PLAYED LIKE A FIDDLE (AND SCHOOLED LIKE A CHILD) PLAYED LIKE A FIDDLE (AND SCHOOLED LIKE A CHILD) PLAYED LIKE A FIDDLE (AND SCHOOLED LIKE A CHILD)	Senators : Honasan, Sotto, Trillanes and Marcos Senators : Honasan, Sotto, Trillanes and Marcos Senators : Honasan, Sotto, Trillanes and Marcos	Ninoy Ninoy Ninoy
The USA President Barack Obama 2009 The USA President Barack Obama 2009 The USA President Barack Obama 2009	September 11, 2001 attacks September 11, 2001 attacks September 11, 2001 attacks	Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, President of South Africa, Peace Maker Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, President of South Africa, Peace Maker Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, President of South Africa, Peace Maker	Chief Justice John Marshall Chief Justice John Marshall Chief Justice John Marshall
Girard College pickets Girard College pickets Girard College pickets	SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW The Supreme Court will hear arguments over the constitutionality of Obama's health care law, Jess Bravin reports on Markets Hub. Photo: AFP/ Getty Images. The court, in a short written order, agreed to hear a challenge brought by a group of Republican ...	U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to health-care law during election ... U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to health-care law during election ... The administration agreed to seek prompt Supreme Court review of the health care overhaul, though it had options for trying to delay the court's consideration of the law until after the election. The Justice Department passed up the chance to ask the ...	Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees to toss ... Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees to toss ... WASHINGTON — A conservative-leaning appeals court panel on Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of President Barack Obama's health care law, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider this week whether to resolve conflicting rulings over the law's ...
Wonkbook: Questioning Obama as manager Wonkbook: Questioning Obama as manager The DC circuit decision shows the Supreme Court two ways forward on health care, writes Noah Feldman: "Silberman's decision, then, was an expression of old- fashioned legal reasoning: He just didn't find the arguments for unconstitutionality convincing ...	Health Care's Big Constitutional Test Looms Health Care's Big Constitutional Test Looms America's constitutional debate over health care enters a new and critical stage this morning: the US Supreme Court is set to begin a process that could lead to a final decision on the fate of the massive new federal law. As the nine Justices assemble ...	SC stay order SC stay order That the Supreme Court (SC) on Sunday stayed the Cabinet recommendation for presidential amnesty to murder-convict UCPN-Maoist lawmaker Bal Krishna Dhungel, comes as a relief for all those who believe that the rule of law should prevail. ...	N2K Top 10: Toomey: Congress Could Revisit Sequesters if Committee Fails ... N2K Top 10: Toomey: Congress Could Revisit Sequesters if Committee Fails ... SUPREMES ON HEALTH REFORM LAW. The US Supreme Court is expected to say later Monday, probably in a batch of announcements at 10 am, whether it has chosen to accept any of the various challenges to the 2010 health reform law. Justices met on Thursday to ...
For the First Time in a Century, the Supreme Court Is Divided by Party Affiliation For the First Time in a Century, the Supreme Court Is Divided by Party Affiliation All eyes are on the Supreme Court this week as it considers what to do with the landmark lawsuits challenging President Obama's health care legislation. While the question that intrigues court watchers is whether the nine justices will transcend their ...	How Conservative Judges Just Provided the Most Authoritative Legal Defense of ... How Conservative Judges Just Provided the Most Authoritative Legal Defense of ... By grounding its defense of the individual mandate in the text of the Constitution itself, the DC Circuit's opinion is far more difficult to attack than other opinions and commentaries that rely upon vulnerable Supreme Court decisions—such as the ...	The golden age of opposition research The golden age of opposition research It was founded in November 2010, after the Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case opened the door to "SuperPACs," political action committees that are able to raise unlimited amounts of anonymous money to craft attack and advocacy ads ...	Chamber Of Commerce Asks Supreme Court To Review Health Care Law Chamber Of Commerce Asks Supreme Court To Review Health Care Law By MARK SHERMAN 10/25/11 04:53 PM ET WASHINGTON -- The US Chamber of Commerce, which has been a fierce opponent of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, is taking a more nuanced approach in urging the Supreme Court to take up review of the law ...
Will the Supreme Court Carve Up Obamacare? Will the Supreme Court Carve Up Obamacare? By Greg Stohr and Alex Wayne For insurance companies nervously watching the legal fight over the constitutionality of the President's health-care law, it would be the unthinkable: The US Supreme Court strikes down the law's so-called individual mandate ...	Landlord not liable in treadmill fall, court rules Landlord not liable in treadmill fall, court rules A Superior Court judge said the agreement conflicted with the 1975 state law, but the appeals court disagreed. Landlords are legally required to provide dwellings that are habitable and safe, but have no obligation to offer health and recreation ...	Doctors, hospitals in Okla. could face sweeping legal changes from reform ... Doctors, hospitals in Okla. could face sweeping legal changes from reform ... That drew McKinney's concerns over the carefully crafted personal health information rules found in the Health Insurance Care Portability and Accountability Act. The court referred to the act, McKinney said, but did not say HIPAA passes muster. ...	May I investigate you sir, on credible allegations of corruption against you? May I investigate you sir, on credible allegations of corruption against you? What should the nation think of the seemingly urgent willingness of our Members of Parliament across the political spectrum to entrench as law a provision which was severely criticized by the Supreme Court of India when existing as a Government ...
More Courts to Focus On Malpractice Claims More Courts to Focus On Malpractice Claims Judge Pfau herself will take cases in Brooklyn, where she is an acting state Supreme Court justice in the commercial division. She said it would be good to make the program citywide and makes sense to extend it to Long Island. ...

Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites

Nepals other revolution: Red turns to pink

With the conservatives cherished rules in flux, the gay rights lobby succeeded in convincing Nepals Supreme Court to instruct the new government to repeal age-old laws that made homosexuality ... Campaigns Pandey agrees that sexual minorities rights ...

Supreme Court Is Asked to Rule on Health Care

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to hear a case concerning the 2010 health care overhaul law. The development ...

Health Care Reform News - The New York Times

The health care law seeks to extend insurance to more than 30 million ... 245 to 189 in favor of repeal, in what both sides agreed was largely a symbolic act, given ... fate is widely seen to rest in the hands of Supreme Court, which is likely to rule on ... In September, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to hear its ...

Interview with John W. Swainson, conducted by Roger F. Lane ...

Contents Justice Swainson talks about his educational background, serving in all three branches of state government, and his election to the Supreme Court in ...

Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on ACA Individual Mandate

The Supreme Court stated today that it will rule on whether the mandate is severable from the rest of the law. In one of those voided cases ... journalism competition of the National Institute for Health Care Management, and several have been republished ...

Issue 3 — Ohioans consider health care question

but their decision is probably irrelevant since the final ruling on the issue likely will come from the U.S. Supreme Court. Voters who say "yes" to Ohio Issue 3 oppose any law or rule that mandates any person, employer or health care provider participate ...

Is Pelosi, Reid and Obama now realize the hole they dug for themselves?

1. Two previous rulings siding with the dems, ruled on the commerce clause and agreed with the dems as a single challenged element of the Health care law. ( known as Obamacare ). 2. The Florida Federal judge just ruled that no "severability" was placed into Obamacare as congress ( Pelosi & Reid ) should have done by congressional parliamentary procedure. This would of allowed any specific element to be challenged in court leaving the the balance of Obamacare to be left intact. 3. In the absence of "severability" which was not reviewed by the two fed judges ruling in the dems behalf, then tossing out one element, must be attached to the entire Obamacare law. 4. The Florida Federal judge got it correct.......and now based on this federal judge tossing out the entire Obamacare law....only a Federal Court of Appeals can touch it. Oh......dont assume the San Francisco based 9th Circuit court of appeals may take it on as they just got overturned 3 times in the last 3 weeks on other cases by SCOTUS who said the Constitution is the supreme document.....not a panel of judges who find theyre against it. Do you see Pelosi, Reid and Obama now realize theyve painted themselves into a corner? The Florida Judge ruling...."Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not "severable", the entire act must be declared void. It is difficult to imagine that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to a British mandate giving the East India Company a monopoly and imposing a nominal tax on all tea sold in America would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place. If Congress can penalize a passive individual for failing to engage in commerce, the enumeration of powers in the Constitution would have been in vain for it would be difficult to perceive any limitation on federal power [Lopez, supra, 514 U.S. at 564], and we would have a Constitution in name only." ----->> US Federal District Judge Roger Vinson * January 31, 2011
Answer: libs are getting a big dose of reality
Category: Politics

NEWS SUMMARY

INTERNATIONAL A3-12 U.N. Critic Bolton Chosen As Ambassador to U.N. President Bush chose John R. Bolton, a blunt-spoken conservative known for his sharp skepticism toward the United Nations and international diplomacy, as the new United States ambassador to the U.N. A1 No Date for Syrian Withdrawal The Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, clarified

Justice Dept. Asks Supreme Court for Health Care Ruling - Blogrunner

"Supreme Court Is Asked to Rule on Health Care": Adam Liptak will have this article ... administration is asking the Supreme Court to rule on the healthcare law . .... On Wednesday, the administration agreed to seek a swift review of President ...

Daily Report - Kaiser Health News

21 minutes ago ... Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge To Health Law ...

Please read my persuasive speech for Social Studies?!?

I am fourteen, and have written a persuasive speech for Social Studies. The speech has to be about a reform that you believe in. And feedback, advice, suggestions, etc. would be greatly appreciated!!! When those qualities of life you’ve always enjoyed are no longer there for you, is it time to end your life? The Death with Dignity act gives terminally ill patients the choice of life or death. The debate began in 1990, with the case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. A child was involved in a car accident that left her in a persistent vegetative state. This means that she was alive, but not living. Her brain damage was permanent. Two weeks after the accident, her parents decided to let her go, but the state hospital officials refused to pull the plug without court approval. Their case reached the Supreme Court. The final ruling was that an incompetent person was not able to exercise the right to refuse treatment. The measure stating that Oregon physicians had the permit to write a prescription for lethal drugs to qualified terminally ill patients was passed on November 8, 1994. The residents of Oregon voted on the act. 51.3 percent votes were cast in favor of the measure, while 48.7 percent were cast against. The right to humanely end one’s life by prescription drugs should be available to all terminally ill patients across the nation. Today, I will tell you a story. Then, I will share with you present-day statistics. Lastly, I will persuade you with the measures regulations. My aunt lived in California. She had ovarian cancer. At the time of her diagnosis, she was given less than two years to live. She went through chemotherapy, and she had an operation. Her ovaries were removed, and her stomach was scraped. Unfortunately, she kept dying. She called her sister, my grandma, inquiring about the prescription that would humanely end her life. She wanted to come up to Oregon, and see a few doctors. She would bring her medical documents, and pretend that she was a resident. A follow-up appointment with a doctor here in Oregon was required, and she would have had to stay with my grandma for a total of two weeks. The end was near, and she knew it. She opted out and stayed in California so that she could be with her family. The last two weeks of her life were horrendous. She was very ill. When she vomited, she vomited blood. She couldn’t eat, so she starved. Her body was shutting down. She slept for most of the time in an attempt to escape the pain. One day, she was wheeled into her living room. She looked at my grandma, who was visiting, and said, “I’m ready for my Oregon pills now.” My grandma replied, “I’m so sorry. We tried our best.” If she had taken them right then, it would have saved her from four more days of hell. She died in pain, along with so many others that merely could not get a hold of the drugs that would have allowed them to peacefully pass on. I will now share with you the Death with Dignity act statistics. In ten years, 541 Oregonians have requested the lethal prescriptions. Of that 541, 341 patients have actually ingested the drugs. Still, that is 341 lives saved from, say, four more days of hell. The average patient to use the drug is seventy-years-old. 81.8 percent of patients suffer from cancer, and 95.1 percent have experienced no complications. If you still don’t agree with the Death with Dignity act, here are the laws regulations. Terminally ill people have not flocked to Oregon from other states in attempt to end their lives by assisted suicide, and the safeguards against abuse towards the right appears to be effective. The Oregon law required that the patient self-administers the prescribed medication to hasten death. The law also ensures that the patient is the driving force. Sue Williams, head of the local Right to Life group, campaigned against the Death with Dignity act. She said, “I don’t think you can have a dignified death when you choose to kill yourself. This law is a bad law.” I disagree, along with so many others. Glenn Elfman, a sixty-two-year-old terminal-cancer patient, said that the Death with Dignity act “…provides an option for me as a patient, a person suffering from a terminal illness when the medical profession has run out of all other options.” I believe that the Death with Dignity act should be legal in all fifty states. Share with the world, and tell them of all the peace that has been restored to the suffering through the Death with Dignity act. The residents of Oregon, and now Washington, have a choice, but why not give everyone that choice? I believe that every U.S. citizen that is terminally ill should be given the chance to make their own decision, whether it be life or death.
Answer: Very well done! And, I agree with you.
Category: Homework Help

Abortion Law: Did Roe v. Wade Recognize a Fetus as "Living?"?

Some people are arguing that Roe v. Wade agreed that life begins at conception and that a fetus is a life. They say that the only thing the court said was that a mothers right to privacy trumps that life. Here is the statement: "in Roe v. Wade, the US Supreme Court never denies that a fetus is a human life. The SC recognized that the fetus is a life, and that the state had a legitimate interest to protect the health and safety of that life. Instead, the SC ruled that the states iinterest in protecting the safety and welfare of that life was outweighed by the mothers right to privacy. The decision is based on the womans right to privacy, which is not an express right in the Consititution, but rather one that the Court implied from a line of illegal search and seizure cases." I see nowhere in Roe v. Wade the court saying anything about life. Would someone well acquainted with the law confirm or discredit these claims that in Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court said anything about a fetus being alive? Buddy R, I didnt ask your personal opinion. I asked for the historical facts. You didnt give them. If you would like to pretend that a clump of cells is a "child" somewhere else, do it. Idiotic views that in no way answer my question are not welcome here.
Answer: Yes. It is stupid to say the mother's right to murder her child outweighs the child's right to live. Tthe fetus has unique human DNA and so is not part of the mother's body but is a separate human life. Only a liar can deny that scientific fact. No one should have the right to murder their baby. Our founding fathers wrote of a right to life but did not mention a right to murder a child.
Category: Law & Ethics

The Fathers Crusade

After tomorrow, Ill have done everything there is to do, Jason Hatch said one night in February, staring wistfully into a near-finished glass of beer at a bar in Shrewsbury, England. Just a few hours earlier, he and some friends were enjoying a raucous, boisterous evening, all but driving out the other diners at a decorous French restaurant. - Susan Dominus is a contributing writer for the magazine. Her most recent cover article was about adult children of gay parents. - By Susan Dominus

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Health Care Mandate

As predicted, the U.S. Supreme Court today agreed to hear a challenge to the health-care overhaul act passed in 2010, “with a decision on President Obama's most controversial domestic achievement likely to come in the summer of his reelection campaign,” … ... USA Today says that, “The justices will hear arguments on the health care law in March; they are expected to rule by the end of the current term, which normally comes in late June. The key legal question is ...

Justice Dept. asks Supreme Court to review health-care law - The ...

The Obama administration is appealing to the Supreme Court to uphold the law that aims to extend insurance coverage to more than 30 million Americans.

Political fallout?

Tommy Creel agrees ... the rule. Employers are not allowed to terminate “whistle blowers.” A whistle blower, an individual who reports wrong doing on the employer’s part, does have some job protection under the law. The Mississippi Supreme Court ...

Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees ...

5 days ago... health care law as constitutional, helping set up a Supreme Court fight. ... Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees ...

Attorney Blog

The day before yesterday the Supreme Court issued its ruling in CIGNA v. Amara, Case No. 09-804, 2011 U.S. LEXIS ...

Administration Asks Supreme Court to Rule Quickly on Health Law

By Adam Liptak for the New York Times – The Obama administration asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to hear a case concerning the 2010 health care overhaul law.

Supreme Court Inc.

I. The headquarters of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, located across from Lafayette Park in Washington, is a limestone structure that looks almost as majestic as the Supreme Court. The similarity is no coincidence: both buildings were designed by the same architect, Cass Gilbert. Lately, however, the affinities between the court and the chamber, a - Jeffrey Rosen article on how Supreme Court has come to side more and more with business interests on array of issues, including antitrust policy, corporate wrongdoing, product liability and punitive damages; notes that litigation center of US Chamber of Commerce filed briefs in 15 cases in term ended last June and that its side won 13 of them, highest percentage of victories in centers 30-year history; says that pro-business outlook, which can be seen in courts liberal as well as conservative justices, may reflect emerging spirit of agreement among nations liberal and conservative elites about value of free markets, but that this consensus may not be shared by country as whole, which, if anything, appears to be moving in populist direction; drawings (L) - Jeffrey Rosen, a law professor at George Washington University, is a frequent contributor to the magazine. He is the author, most recently, of The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America. - By JEFFREY ROSEN

archive.lib.msu.edu

This week, for the second time, a federal judge has struck down part or all of the health care law enacted by Congress last year. But legal experts caution ...

courtweek.com - November 1, 2011The Law of Post-Halloween Legal ...

November 1, 2011 The Law of Post-Halloween Legal Standards by David Horrigan. Today is All Saints Day or All Hallows, a holy day of obligation for some.

Medicaid patient access at stake in high court case

Independent Living Center of Southern California, and that case is now in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices could rule as early ... of the Medicaid law? The answer should be yes. If the high court agrees, every time a state considers ...

Business at Hand > Judges acting above the law by claiming they’re exempt from pension contribution

Jeff Van Drew is supporting the Republican governor while his Republican challenger David DeWeese agrees with ... one of their own rule that they are above the law and should be treated preferentially. We trust that the Supreme Court will reverse this ...

D.C. Court Of Appeals Upholds Health Law's Individual Mandate ...

... the Supreme Court (Aizenman, 11/8). The Associated Press/Washington Post: Appeals Court Rules Obama Health Care Law Is Constitutional, Agrees To Toss Religious Suit ... The case is shaping up to be the most contentious at the Supreme Court in more than a decade, but everyone involved agrees at least on one point: They need to know as soon as possible whether the new health care law is constitutional (Biskupic, 11/8). Politico: D.C. Court Upholds Health ...

National Navigator | D.C. Court Of Appeals Upholds Health Law's ...

5 days ago ... Meanwhile, the Supreme Court weighs hearing arguments on the ... Appeals Court Rules Obama Health Care Law Is Constitutional, Agrees To ...

High Court Agrees to Take up Health-Care Challenge

Is President Obama’s health-care overhaul constitutional ... for a long time — and well before the law was passed in March of 2010. At last, some resolution is on its way. The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday did what it had long been expected ...

Court rules health insurance mandate uncostitutional: now what?

Poor Obama, all his dreams are poised to be shattered. In one of the main legal challenges against the health care reform passed last year, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Atlanta declared the laws "individual mandate" unconstitutional, calling it an "unprecedented exercise of congressional power." The 2-1 ruling constitutes the first time a Democrat-appointed judged has struck down the mandate. Federal judges have been weighing in on the bills constitutionality for a while now and health care reporters and pundits are weighing in on where the ruling leaves the legislation. This is headed for the Supreme Court. "If there was ever any doubt that the long-raging debate over the constitutionality of the federal health-care overhaul... would ultimately be settled by the U.S. Supreme Court, that doubt was all but extinguished today," writes Ashby Jones at The Wall Street Journals Law Blog. Steve Benen at the Washington Monthly agrees: "With the 6th and 11th circuits in conflict, there is now no real doubt that the Supreme Court will have to hear the case. We can probably expect a ruling next June — about five months before the presidential election."
Category: Elections

Supreme Court Likely to Rule on Health Law in 2012 - US - CBN ...

President Obamas health care law is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court just as the 2012 election season heats up. On Wednesday, the White House formally appealed the ...

Hope for respect and a space of their own

Sbenaty agrees. "I believe the Muslim community in Murfreesboro ... I am sure that in the end if it were to go to the Supreme Court, they will rule in our favour, because we have not done anything illegal, and neither do we have any such intention in ...

Obama Health Care Law Case Reaches Supreme Court

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide the fate of President Barack Obama's healthcare law, with an election-year ruling due by July on the U.S. healthcare system's biggest overhaul in nearly 50 years. The decision had been widely expected since late September, when ... High court asked to rule on Obama health care law - San Francisco Chronicle: USA TodayHigh court asked to rule o... Obama Health-Care Law Gets Mixed Reaction From ...

Appeals Court Rules Health Law Is Constitutional - WSJ.com

5 days ago ... In the 20th century, Judge Silberman wrote, the Supreme Court recognized "the ... If the court agrees to consider a health-law challenge, oral ...

MAGAZINE PREVIEW; Inside Obamas War on Terrorism

The evening before he was sworn into office, Barack Obama stepped out of Blair House, the government residence where he was staying across from the White House, and climbed into an armored limousine for the ride to a bipartisan dinner. Joining him in the back seat were John Brennan, his new counterterrorism adviser, and two foreign-policy advisers, - Peter Baker is a White House correspondent for The Times and a contributing writer for the magazine. - By PETER BAKER

The Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Duke v. Wal-Mart Inc. Class ...

Betty Dukes, a greeter at a Wal-Mart store in Pittsburg, California, and five of her co-workers filed a class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart in 2001. The suit ...

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Health Reform Challenge

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Health Reform Challenge. The Court agreed to hear only the 11th Circuit challenge, which is the only one to have found the law to be invalid. The Supreme Court will rule both on the ...

Attorney Blog - Louisville, Kentucky Auto and Truck Accident and ...

Watch the WHAS 11 Investigation Team News Story about the ...

DeWine asks U.S. Supreme Court to rule on health care law ...

Ohio is among 26 states that asked the U.S. Supreme Court today to consider the constitutionality of the 2010 federal health care law. Attorney General Mike DeWine ...

SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW

WASHINGTON—The long-awaited Supreme Court showdown over the Obama administrations health-care overhaul formally began Monday as the justices agreed to consider a high-profile challenge to the law. The court, in a short written order, agreed ...

KAIRY v. SUPERSHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL 20

In General Order 158–A, the PUC promulgated rules governing the operations ... Discussion In a case requiring a federal court to apply California law, the court “must apply the law as it believes the California Supreme Court would apply it.”

Why does Obama hate the first amendment? Shouldnt he agree with settled law?

excerpt... Fans of the First Amendment can rejoice. In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court today struck down large portions of the abomination known as the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, especially those aspects of the law that imposed restrictions on corporate spending on political issues. BUT Obamas response is typical amendment hating progressive... With its ruling today, the Supreme Court has given a green light to a new stampede of special interest money in our politics. It is a major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests that marshal their power every day in Washington to drown out the voices of everyday Americans. … We are going to talk with bipartisan congressional leaders to develop a forceful response to this decision. http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/ So I ask again, why does our own President hate the first amendment so?
Answer: ...he only is going to miss the way George Sorros pumped millions of dollars into his and other Dims campaigns by filtering it through individuals and "bundlers"...now everyone will know how much his master Sorros spends to control the Dims...
Category: Politics

Californians, what is your vote on prop 8?

When Gay Rights and Religious Liberties Clash by Barbara Bradley Hagerty NPR.org, June 13, 2008 · In recent years, some states have passed laws giving residents the right to same-sex unions in various forms. Gay couples may marry in Massachusetts and California. There are civil unions and domestic partnerships in Vermont, New Jersey, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Oregon. Other states give more limited rights. Armed with those legal protections, same-sex couples are beginning to challenge policies of religious organizations that exclude them, claiming that a religious groups view that homosexual marriage is a sin cannot be used to violate their right to equal treatment. Now parochial schools, "parachurch" organizations such as Catholic Charities and businesses that refuse to serve gay couples are being sued — and so far, the religious groups are losing. Here are a few cases: Adoption services: Catholic Charities in Massachusetts refused to place children with same-sex couples as required by Massachusetts law. After a legislative struggle — during which the Senate president said he could not support a bill "condoning discrimination" — Catholic Charities pulled out of the adoption business in 2006. Housing: In New York City, Yeshiva Universitys Albert Einstein College of Medicine, a school under Orthodox Jewish auspices, banned same-sex couples from its married dormitory. New York does not recognize same-sex marriage, but in 2001, the states highest court ruled Yeshiva violated New York Citys ban on sexual orientation discrimination. Yeshiva now allows all couples in the dorm. Parochial schools: California Lutheran High School, a Protestant school in Wildomar, holds that homosexuality is a sin. After the school suspended two girls who were allegedly in a lesbian relationship, the girls parents sued, saying the school was violating the states civil rights act protecting gay men and lesbians from discrimination. The case is before a state judge. Medical services: A Christian gynecologist at North Coast Womens Care Medical Group in Vista, Calif., refused to give his patient in vitro fertilization treatment because she is in a lesbian relationship, and he claimed that doing so would violate his religious beliefs. (The doctor referred the patient to his partner, who agreed to do the treatment.) The woman sued under the states civil rights act. The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in May 2008, and legal experts believe that the womans right to medical treatment will trump the doctors religious beliefs. One justice suggested that the doctors take up a different line of business. Psychological services: A mental health counselor at North Mississippi Health Services refused therapy for a woman who wanted help in improving her lesbian relationship. The counselor said doing so would violate her religious beliefs. The counselor was fired. In March 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sided with the employer, ruling that the employees religious beliefs could not be accommodated without causing undue hardship to the company. Civil servants: A clerk in Vermont refused to perform a civil union ceremony after the state legalized them. In 2001, in a decision that side-stepped the religious liberties issue, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled that he did not need to perform the ceremony because there were other civil servants who would. However, the court did indicate that religious beliefs do not allow employees to discriminate against same-sex couples. Adoption services: A same-sex couple in California applied to Adoption Profiles, an Internet service in Arizona that matches adoptive parents with newborns. The couples application was denied based on the religious beliefs of the companys owners. The couple sued in federal district court in San Francisco. The two sides settled after the adoption company said it will no longer do business in California. Wedding services: A same sex couple in Albuquerque asked a photographer, Elaine Huguenin, to shoot their commitment ceremony. The photographer declined, saying her Christian beliefs prevented her from sanctioning same-sex unions. The couple sued, and the New Mexico Human Rights Commission found the photographer guilty of discrimination. It ordered her to pay the lesbian couples legal fees ($6,600). The photographer is appealing. Wedding facilities: Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association of New Jersey, a Methodist organization, refused to rent its boardwalk pavilion to a lesbian couple for their civil union ceremony. The couple filed a complaint with the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights. The division ruled that the boardwalk property was open for public use, therefore the Methodist group could not discriminate against gay couples using it. In the interim, the states Department of Environmental Protection revoked a portion of the associations tax benefits. The case is ongoing. Youth
Answer: I pray to God that it passes. We must protect one of the Church's Sacraments. This does not mean that we are against homosexuals. People just think that Prop 8 hates homosexuals. NOT TRUE! Please read what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say on Homosexuality: Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms throughout the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on sacred Scripture, which present homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity [Gen. 19:1-29, Rom. 1:24-27, 1 Cor. 6:10, 1Tim. 1:10], tradition has always declared that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered [Persona Humana 8]. They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved. The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. They do not choose their homosexual condition; for most of them it is a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition. Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
Category: Civic Participation

Appeals court upholds Obama health care law

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A conservative-leaning appeals court panel on Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of President Barack Obamas health care law, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider this week whether to resolve conflicting rulings over ...

MAGAZINE PREVIEW; Obamas War Over Terror

The evening before he was sworn into office, Barack Obama stepped out of Blair House, the government residence where he was staying across from the White House, and climbed into an armored limousine for the ride to a bipartisan dinner. Joining him in the back seat were John Brennan, his new counterterrorism adviser, and two foreign-policy advisers, - Peter Baker is a White House correspondent for The Times and a contributing writer for the magazine. - By PETER BAKER

Why did Palin change her mind on benefits for same sex couples?

In the debate last Thursday, Palin said she supports benefits for same sex couples. But she felt very differently 2 years ago when same-sex couples sued the state of Alaska for equal benefits and Palin went to great lengths to deny them, agreeing to extend the benefits only when the Supreme Court ruled that she had to. “Gov. Sarah Palin said Wednesday that she will comply with an Alaska Supreme Court order issued Tuesday to offer health and retiree benefits to same-sex partners of state employees starting Jan. 1. "We believe that we have no more judicial options to pursue. So we may disagree with kind of the foundation there, the rationale behind the ruling, but our responsibility is to proceed forward with the law and abide by the constitution," Palin said. But ultimately, she said, she supports denying those benefits through a constitutional amendment…" http://dwb.adn.com/front/story/8508726p-8401181c.html Why do you think she changed her mind about this, when she felt so adamantly about it 2 years ago? Brian, can I have a link to the source of that, please? I’ve read through the archives of Alaska Daily News on this subject, and found nothing of the sort. In fact, just the opposite. She stated repeatedly that gay state employees should NOT be given the same rights as heterosexuals. Do the research.
Answer: I love how you liars edit the truth to support your bogus claims. What you missed there with your convienent ... was "But ultimately, she said, she supports denying those benefits through a constitutional amendment, IF THAT'S WHAT THE PUBLIC WANTS." So essentially she believes the choice should be left up to the people which is exactly her job as a public servant. What is it like to be an absolute liar, it must be pretty freeing to never have to worry about the truth.
Category: Politics

Carroll & Carroll, P.C. Blog

Here is a link to an article from the Morning Times in Sayre, Pennsylvania. The article covers the controversy of adding an EMTA "park and ride" parking lot at the ...

Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees ...

6 days ago ... Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees to ... health care law as constitutional, helping set up a Supreme Court fight. ...

D.C. Court Of Appeals Upholds Health Law's Individual Mandate ...

5 days ago ... Meanwhile, the Supreme Court weighs hearing arguments on the ... Appeals Court Rules Obama Health Care Law Is Constitutional, Agrees To ...

Justice Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Health Care Law - Meghan ...

The Justice Department on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to decide the constitutionality of President Obamas landmark health reform law, increasing the likelihood ...

Health Cares Big Constitutional Test Looms

Americas constitutional debate over health care enters a new and critical stage this morning: the U.S. Supreme Court is set ... chore themselves. The Court almost always agrees to hear a case when a federal law has been ruled unconstitutional in lower ...

Ready for Tuesdays election? Heres a breakdown of statewide ballot issues and other things to remember on Election Day

That’s what you might think based on the relentless TV commercials and media coverage of Issue 2, the referendum on Senate Bill 5, the state’s new collective bargaining law ... health care bill - should it ultimately prevail in the Supreme ...

Supreme Court agrees to hear Obama healthcare law – Reuters ...

USA TodaySupreme Court agrees to hear Obama healthcare lawReutersAn opponent of health care reform holds a sign as he listens to Congressman David Scott (D... ... Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health LawWall Street Journal ...

How Will Supreme Court Rule On Health Care Law? : NPR

This week, for the second time, a federal judge has struck down part or all of the health care law enacted by Congress last year. But legal experts caution ...

Inside The Times: April 20, 2009

INTERNATIONAL IRANS LEADER ASKS PROSECUTOR To Review Case of U.S. Journalist President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in a rare effort to intervene in the justice system, urged Tehrans chief prosecutor to fairly examine the cases of an Iranian-American journalist and an Iranian-Canadian blogger. PAGE A6 U.S. BOYCOTTS U.N. CONFERENCE The first United

Justices Term Offers Hot Issues and Future Hints

WASHINGTON -- The new Supreme Court term, which begins Monday, includes cases on some of the most contested issues of the day, including protests at military funerals, illegal immigration, support for religious schools, violent video games, DNA evidence and prosecutorial misconduct. The terms arguments and decisions will be scrutinized for - By ADAM LIPTAK

SUPREME COURT AGREES TO RULE ON HEALTH LAW – Wall Street Journal ...

USA TodaySupreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health LawWall Street JournalWASHINGTON—The long-awaited Supreme Court showdown over the Obama administration's.

Justices Are Asked to Hear Challenge to Health Care Law

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court was asked on Wednesday to hear a challenge to the health care overhaul law, raising the possibility that the justices could rule on the matter by next summer, just months before the presidential election. Similar requests are likely to follow, and it is not clear which if any of them the court will agree to hear. The - By ADAM LIPTAK

Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge To Health Law - Kaiser Health ...

At 10 a.m. today, the Supreme Court issued its orders for the upcoming 2012 term, which includes the details of how the oral arguments related to the health law will shape up. ... about the act. The White House said 'we are pleased that the court has agreed to hear this case'" (Holland, 11/14). ... That timeline means the court will rule on President Barack Obama's signature legislative achievement during the thick of the 2012 presidential campaign" (Kendall, 11/14). ...

Obama's Health-Care Law to Get Supreme Court Review ...

Photographer: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images The US Supreme Court agreed to review the constitutionality of President ... Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health LawWall Street Journal Supreme Court to hear ...

Taking the Least of You

The Tissue-Industrial Complex Anna OConnell couldnt find Ted. She stood bent at the waist on a frigid afternoon last December, her head and all its fuzzy red hair crammed into an old stand-up freezer that looked like something you get milk from at the corner store: tall, white with a bit of rust and a pull handle. That freezer is the first thing - Rebecca Skloot article on question of who owns blood and pieces of tissue that are routinely removed from Americans in course of any number of medical procedures and are used by scientists to develop everything from flu vaccines to penis-enlargement products; says that while scientists now have access to all the blood and tissues they want, growing number of activists--lawyers, ethicists, doctors and patients--are arguing cases and pushing for federal regulations that would grant people rights to control their tissues and profit from whatever uses they are put to; discusses litigation over Washington Universitys control over vast collection of prostate and blood samples that Dr William Catalona amassed while he worked at university, which is challenged by Catalona and many of his patients; drawings (L) - Rebecca Skloot is the author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, about the history, ethics and ownership of the first human cell line, which will be published by Crown next year. - By Rebecca Skloot

Supreme Court Asked to Rule on Health Care Law | Daily Political

The Obama administration asked the Supreme Court to rule on the case regarding the 2010 health care overhaul law. With this latest development, it wouldn’t be long ...

U.S. asks Supreme Court to rule on health care law - San Jose ...

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to hear a case concerning the 2010 health care overhaul law. The development, which came ...

BC-AP News Digest 9:40 pm

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court invokes visions of Big Brother in a ... HEALTH CARE OVERHAUL — Appeals court rules Obama health care law is constitutional, agrees to toss religious suit. — OBAMA-DRILLING — The Obama administration cautiously offers ...

Supreme Court Roundup; Court to Rule on What Constitutes Employer Retaliation

For more than 40 years, federal law has prohibited employers from retaliating against employees who complain about discrimination on the job. But neither Congress, which included the anti-retaliation protection in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, nor the Supreme Court has ever defined retaliation. On Monday, the justices agreed to provide the - By LINDA GREENHOUSE

United States: Supreme Court Agrees To Resolve Deep Circuit Split And Decide If Alient Tort Statute Permits Actions Against Corporations

We have followed the development of federal Circuit law on whether the Alien Tort Statute ... and broad powers to make distributions to Terry and Spencer. Supreme Court To Rule On Corporate Liability For International Human Rights Violations (WilmerHale ...